07 Sep 2026

feedDrupal.org aggregator

Très Bien Blog: composer drupal-patch-check

composer drupal-patch-check

A composer plugin created to make it easy for humans to upgrade their patched Drupal websites.

If you ever wanted to know if you still needed that patch after an update, or if your custom patch would still apply to the new version of the module, or if your 15 levels patch tower still applies after the update, this is the tool for you. Install the composer plugin and get started using the remote API.

theodore

07 Sep 2026 10:00am GMT

The Drop Times: Open-Weight AI Puts Openness on the Policy Agenda

Debate over open-weight AI moved from model releases into policy at the G20 technology meeting on 1 September 2026. Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg argued against broad restrictions on open-weight models, while the United States urged governments to avoid sweeping new AI rules. The discussion turns "open" from a technical distribution choice into a term that governments and technology companies are also using when arguing about access and control.

That distinction became more concrete two days later. The Institute of Foundation Models released K2 Horizon, a family of six AI models for which it published weights, code, training data or detailed data-construction information, intermediate checkpoints, configurations and other parts of the training lifecycle. Meta's Muse Glimmer, released on 10 August, makes its model weights available under the Apache 2.0 licence, but the K2 release illustrates how many additional components may sit behind a broader claim of openness.

The Open Source Initiative provides a more specific framework through its Open Source AI Definition. It defines open-source AI through the freedoms to use, study, modify and share a system and says the preferred form for making modifications must include information about training data, the relevant source code and the model parameters. Downloadable weights can therefore provide meaningful control without, by themselves, establishing that every part of an AI system is open source.

The same problem appears when AI is placed inside a wider digital service. An open-weight model can sit behind a proprietary application, while an open-source content platform can depend on a closed model service. Hosting, search, analytics, organisational data and integrations can each introduce separate dependencies, so openness at one layer does not establish the status of the whole stack.

Drupal provides a useful comparison because its openness applies to a different technological layer. Drupal.org describes the platform as open source, with publicly inspectable code, freedom to modify the software and no single commercial provider controlling the platform. Those freedoms apply to the content-management platform; they do not make an attached AI model, hosting service, analytics system or external integration open.

Three weeks ago, Editor's Pick asked how open-weight AI changes the control available to organisations that depend on it. The G20 debate and K2 Horizon release sharpen that question: control has to be examined layer by layer rather than inferred from one label. For Drupal teams evaluating AI services, that means considering the model, code, data, hosting, integrations and publishing system separately and asking what can be inspected, modified, moved or replaced.

Follow The DropTimes on LinkedIn, X, Bluesky, and Facebook, or join #thedroptimes on Drupal Slack.

This issue of Editor's Pick was written and curated by Kazima Abbas.

07 Sep 2026 8:59am GMT

06 Sep 2026

feedDrupal.org aggregator

PreviousNext: If you're using Twig's raw filter with Drupal, you're doing it wrong

With some recent security advisories for Cross Site Scripting (XSS), it feels like an opportune time to remind those who author Twig templates for Drupal:
If you're using Twig's |raw filter, you're probably doing it wrong

by lee.rowlands /

Background

Let's cast our minds back to Drupal 7. A time before twig. We had .tpl.php templates with PHP template as the default templating engine. Every variable available in your template had to be carefully sanitized before being printed to avoid XSS.

This meant remembering to call check_plain or check_markup in preprocessing hooks on every variable.

Not surprisingly security advisories for Cross Site Scripting (XSS) were the the number one vector in Drupal contrib security advisories for Drupal 7 and below.

The release of Drupal 8 saw the adoption of Twig as the default templating engine. With auto-escaping by default, Twig promised to provide enhanced security against XSS vectors. No more needing to remember to call check_plain or check_markup - any variable available to Twig was escaped on output!

Using raw bypasses Twig's protection

Which brings us to using the |raw filter. When you use it you're saying to Twig - actually, don't auto-escape this variable, I know better.

But there are very few cases where this is the correct approach.

And in reaching for |raw you're most likely opening an XSS vector.

What to use instead

If you're looking at a template and you're finding that a variable is being double-escaped. E.g. instead of Mathematics & Data Science you're seeing Mathematics & Data Science you might be tempted to reach for raw to fix it.

Instead you need to examine where the value is coming from.

If you're using Drupal's field formatters, you're unlikely to get into this scenario. The most likely cause is you're accessing raw field values.

E.g. something like $node->field_body->value in either a preprocessing hook or some ungainly Twig expression {{ node.field_body[0].value }}.

Check the type of the field. If its in the Text family, e.g. Text, Text (long), Text (long, with summary). You should instead be using the processed property - $node->field_body->processed. This has already been sanitized and is flagged as safe to Twig. Anything flagged as safe bypasses auto-escaping.

If you're doing something custom, like in a configuration form or similar, lean on the TextFormat form element - '#type' => 'text_format'. This gives you a value and format pair. You can use this with the '#type' => 'processed_text'render element and again, the returned value is already marked as safe.

Failing that, if you want a limited set of HTML tags to be allowed and don't have a filter format to use with the ProcessedText element, you can use a #markup render array. E.g instead of printing a string, use ['#markup' => $the_string] - this will go via Xss::filter with the admin tags list. It will allow through some tags, but will strip out those that can lead to XSS.

So before you reach for |raw

So in summary. If you find yourself reaching for the |raw filter, stop. Instead lean on ProcessedText and pass a format, either one you define or one that the users chooses. Or failing that, use ['#markup' => ...].

Perhaps for some homework, go and check your themes and make sure you don't have any use of raw. Remember to follow the procedure for reporting a security issue if you find anything in a theme with security team support.

06 Sep 2026 11:00pm GMT