fidzu : cms

On today's show we are talking about Site Templates, What they do, and How you can use them with guests Tim Lehnen & Adam Globus-Hoenich. We'll also cover Haven as our module of the week.

For show notes visit: https://www.talkingDrupal.com/569

Topics

• MOTW: Haven
• What Site Templates Are
• Canvas Components Included
• Promoting Templates Beyond Drupal
• Templates vs Distributions
• Who Benefits from Templates
• Template Types and Adoption
• Where to Find Templates
• Featured vs Installer List
• Free vs Paid Templates
• Recipes vs Templates
• Distributions and Themes
• Empowering Site Builders
• Exporting a Template
• Designing for Users
• Releases Without Upgrades
• Best Practices and AI
• How to Contribute

Resources

Webinar: Drupal Canvas and Agentic Content Management: What Enterprise Teams Need to Know Drupal Site Templates Tim's book - Fog & Fireflies

Guests

Tim Lehnen - @TimLehnen hestenet

Adam Globus-Hoenich - @PhenaProxima phenaproxima

Hosts

Nic Laflin - nLighteneddevelopment.com nicxvan Stephen Cross - SecondSginalMedia.com [stephencross]](https://www.drupal.org/u/stephencross) Amber Matz - tugboatqa.com [amber himes matz](https://www.drupal.org/u/amber himes matz)

Module of the Week Correspondent

Martin Anderson-Clutz - mandclu.com mandclu

Haven - Site Template - Designed for non-profit sites, this template features a bright, warm design that can be adapted for many use cases. It comes pre-confifgured with blog, projects and people profiles, as well as newsletter signup, donation add-ons and more.

10 Sep 2026 6:00pm GMT

Register for our next webinar to see a live demonstration of Centarro Bootstrap.

Every new theme for a Drupal Commerce project starts with the same sequence: define your colors, configure button styles, set typography, style your forms, change icons, and then wire all of it into whatever page-building paradigm Drupal currently offers.

After twelve years, our front-end team accumulated a long list of friction points and recurring tasks. Centarro Bootstrap is the result of addressing all of them in a single, reusable foundation. What used to take weeks of custom theming can now be accomplished in hours.

The problem Centarro Bootstrap solves

Beyond making it faster and simpler to complete repetitive theming tasks that every custom Drupal website must perform, Centarro Bootstrap also helps with dynamic page layouts.

Drupal has gone through several iterations of page builders, both as contrib modules and part of Drupal core. Canvas is the current tool, which brings a Figma-like experience. Users can place components directly on a page, compose layouts visually, and see immediate results. Content teams can create single-use content straight from the interface.

Read more

10 Sep 2026 3:08pm GMT

Open Source projects have spent decades asking companies to contribute. Projects should also give buyers the information they need to reward the companies that do.

Any Open Source project with a commercial or institutional funding ecosystem should publish an official contribution record: who contributes, how much and over what period, what kind of work they do, which parts of the project they work on, and, where disclosed, who paid for the work.

The test for a good record is simple. A buyer should be able to answer three questions in about a minute: does this vendor contribute at all, how much do they contribute compared to other vendors, and do they work on the parts of the project I care about?

Contribution does not prove that a vendor can deliver. It is one procurement factor alongside delivery capability, expertise, and price. It matters because some buyers want the money they already spend on Open Source services to help maintain the software they depend on.

Vendors that pay people to do that work carry costs that others avoid, and some of those costs may appear in their rates. A price comparison that ignores those costs can put contributing vendors at a disadvantage. I've argued that procurement should score contribution alongside price. APELL, the European Open Source Software Business Association, has also asked the EU to consider a provider's record of Open Source contribution.

Vendor claims are hard to verify and compare

Say you need a vendor for your Drupal site, your Kubernetes cluster, or whatever Open Source software you use, and two firms bid. Both say they're deeply involved in the project, and both might be telling the truth by their own definition of "involved".

Without a project record, verifying those claims often means reconstructing each vendor's contribution history yourself.

The code repository seems like the obvious place to start, but even counting commits by vendor is not simple. A project has to connect individual contributors to the organizations that employed or funded their work, and those relationships can change over time.

More importantly, Open Source contribution can include documentation, support, event organization, governance work, promotion, and more. Much of that work happens outside the code repository or isn't recorded in a form a buyer can easily interpret.

Projects decide which contributions matter

Drupal has tracked contribution credits since 2015, following a method I proposed in 2014 and now governed by the Drupal Association. Its system records more than code and gives credit not only to individual contributors, but also to the organizations and customers that fund their work.

Not every contribution counts the same. A contribution to Drupal Core or a strategic initiative earns more credit than one to a module that few sites use, and work on contributed projects counts for more when more sites depend on them.

Raw contribution data does not tell buyers which work matters most to the project. The project has the context to decide what advances its priorities and how different contributions should be weighted. Its record should publish those rules, link to the underlying contributions, and explain how mistakes or disputes are corrected. Buyers can then decide how much that record matters for a particular purchase.

Drupal has a strong foundation, and credits feed the Drupal.org marketplace where buyers compare agencies, but I'm not sure we could answer all three questions in sixty seconds today. We still have work to do to make the record easier to find, understand, and compare.

Projects can start with a simple record

Not every project needs a system as elaborate as Drupal's. A small project could begin with a short list: who its recognized organizational contributors are and what they worked on. A text file in the official repository can be enough for a first version.

More complex ecosystems may need separate categories or weighted comparisons. Whatever form it takes, the record has to be easy to find and quick to use.

So if you maintain an Open Source project with a commercial or institutional funding ecosystem, start publishing a contribution record and improve it over time. If you buy services built on Open Source, ask for the project's contribution record. Decide at the start how contribution should count in your purchasing decision, then check bidder claims against the record. If you fund Open Source, use the record to find contributors working on the parts of the project you want to support.

Where buyers can consider contribution, I expect projects with clear records to see more commercial opportunities go to their maintainers than projects that rely on appeals alone.

Special thanks to Henry Poole for his contributions to this blog post, and to Sachiko Muto, Tiffany Farriss, Tim Lehnen and Amandine Le Pape for their review.

09 Sep 2026 6:45pm GMT