computers

23 May 2026

Slashdot

Tech CEOs Call for a Universal Basic Income. But What are the Alternatives?

The Washington Post looks at arguments that "AI's coming upheaval may demand massive infusions of cash to everyday Americans". But they also look at some of the alternatives: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has called for similar public-relief measures, including, potentially, universal basic income, or UBI. Eventually "our current economic setup will no longer make sense," he wrote in a blog post, adding that "there will be a need for a broader societal conversation about how the economy should be organized." Though OpenAI CEO Sam Altman once championed universal basic income, he has since embraced a new structure where the public has "collective ownership" of aspects of AI, according to Business Insider. "I think any version of the future that I can get really excited about means that everybody's got to participate in the upside," he said in a recent podcast interview. In April, OpenAI laid out a set of policy proposals aiming to address the coming upheaval, referencing the transition to the industrial age and the New Deal as points of comparison for what's on the horizon... But some experts question whether tech billionaires, who spent decades resisting regulation, unions and higher taxes, would support the kind of massive redistribution such programs would require. "The only way to pay for UBI is to massively tax those enormously rich people who own the UBI machines," said Jesse Rothstein, a professor of public policy and economics at the University of California at Berkeley who served as chief economist at the U.S. Department of Labor. "It's a nice surprise to hear Elon Musk advocating for that...." Rothstein co-authored a study in 2019 that estimated granting a small income to the entire country would cost a massive amount - nearly double the total spending of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. To issue payments of $12,000 a year to U.S. adults, for example, "would require nearly doubling federal tax revenues," according to the paper... Economists appear to broadly support other solutions beyond redistribution, such as job retraining. A working paper published this spring by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago showed economists support more narrowly tailored solutions to the economic disruption. In late April, Meta appeared to embrace that path, announcing "a multi-year initiative that provides free, rapid training to turn thousands of Americans with no prior experience into high-paid fiber technicians" for projects including data centers. Key quotes from the article: Elon Musk said in an X post that "Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI." "I think it's a marketing tactic" responded Scott Santens, a universal basic income advocate and is CEO of the nonprofit Income to Support All Foundation. He argued to the Washington Post that Musk's comment is "trying to thread this needle of, 'I want to solve this stuff that will potentially put a lot of people out of work.' And how do you avoid people getting really [angry] at that? Okay, well, you're still going to get money, everything will be great it's just you won't have to work anymore...." The article also cites a recent commentary from Jay W. Richards, a senior research fellow and VP of social and domestic policy at the Heritage Foundation. "The new AI prophets of doom suffer from a failure of imagination. They simply cannot envision what work the future will bring, so they conclude it will bring none,"

Caltech Could Lose Control of JPL For First Time In Decades

NASA plans to open competition for the contract to operate JPL for the first time in nearly a century, meaning Caltech's historic role managing the iconic deep-space lab could come to an end when its current agreement expires in 2028. According to JPL, Caltech has managed the lab since the its inception in the 1930s, and has done so for NASA since the agency was established in 1958. Space.com reports: According to the JPL statement, Caltech has been preparing for this possible transition since last summer, so the news "comes as no surprise." But the potential change is part of a larger shakeup for the agency. Earlier this morning, NASA announced a major reorganization, which is separate from the JPL news. "To support the agency's ambitious short- and long-term goals, NASA is taking action to increase specialization at centers and integrate mission directorates, elevating delivery of technically excellent work," the agency said in a statement today. JPL is NASA's lead center for the robotic exploration of Mars and other deep-space locales. The agency has worked with JPL through Caltech as a manager for nearly 70 years. Though JPL still counts as one of NASA's field centers, it's run as a contracted FFRDC (federally funded research and development center). This status has allowed the lab to function slightly differently than other NASA centers; it has a unique sort of independence, though NASA has always had significant oversight of the lab. "As an FFRDC, JPL operates under a special contractual and governance framework designed to ensure that its work is performed in the public interest and aligned with national priorities," NASA has stated. "The FFRDC model enables NASA to retain access to this depth of capability while maintaining a clear separation between government decision-making authority and contractor execution responsibilities." Opening up the competition for institutions beyond Caltech to operate JPL could mean significant changes for everything from day-to-day mission management to big NASA science programs. Until now, JPL and Caltech have been heavily intertwined, with mission personnel, scientists, leadership, and others working closely "across the pond" between JPL and Caltech. JPL mission and program meetings often include Caltech employees and sometimes even take place on its Pasadena campus.

Pentagon Releases Second Batch of UFO Videos, First-Hand Testimony

The Pentagon released a second batch of UAP files, including 50 videos and documents showing unexplained objects over the Middle East, Syria, Iran, and in NASA recordings. Despite the reports, the agency stresses that it has found no evidence of extraterrestrial origin. The Guardian reports: In one video from the Middle East in 2019, taken "likely from an infrared sensor aboard a US military platform operating within the US Central Command area of responsibility," according to the Pentagon, three UAP are captured flying in formation over the Persian Gulf. Another formation of four unidentified objects is seen flying past vessels on the water off Iran in a video from 2022. Footage taken over Syria in 2021 shows a mysterious object racing away at speed akin to instantaneous warp-speed acceleration from science fiction movies. Few of the objects seem to resemble flying saucers, discs or other traditionally perceived forms for UAP, although one October 2022 clip taken at an undisclosed location shows a cigar-shaped entity racing over what appears to be a residential area. None of the videos are accompanied by explanations, and the Pentagon's all-domain anomaly resolution office (AARO) has previously stated it has no evidence to suggest any of the thousands of objects seen on video, or described in written testimony, is of extraterrestrial origin. In its May 8 release, a statement from the defense department said the public "can ultimately make up their own minds about the information contained in these files." Additionally, the information is collated from a diverse range of sources, including government agencies including several military branches, the FBI, the state department and Nasa. "Many of these materials lack a substantiated chain-of-custody," the Pentagon notes

22 May 2026

Ars Technica

Four Russian satellites are now within striking distance of an ICEYE radarsat

"This capability is not common for satellites conducting typical missions."

22 May 2026 10:50pm GMT

Ebola outbreak now third largest recorded and "spreading rapidly"

Ebola outbreak risk level increased as deaths reach 177 with nearly 750 cases.

22 May 2026 10:24pm GMT

First-generation Chromecast users stressed by devices suddenly failing

Google tells Ars it fixed the first-gen Chromecast bug.

22 May 2026 9:42pm GMT

OSnews

Migrating from Ubuntu 16.04 to FreeBSD

Bruno Croci's blog had been running on Ubuntu 16.04 for a long time, well past the Linux distribution's expiration date. As such, it was time to upgrade, but instead of opting for something standard like another Ubuntu release, he opted for FreeBSD instead. This blog has been running on a Digital Ocean VPS for over ten years. A machine hosted in New York City, running Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. An LTS that hasn't been in support for at least 5 years. It was about time to change it. After some considerations, I migrated to a Hetzner virtual machine that is way better than my old Ubuntu one, less than half the price of what I used to pay, and just across the country from me. Not only that, but I took the challenge to move my stack to FreeBSD. It's a long text, but stay for a cool introduction of FreeBSD Jails with Bastille and some interesting site load benchmarks. ↫ Bruno Croci I absolutely adore the recent surge in people (re)discovering the BSDs as a valid alternative to Linux in both the server and desktop space. In this particular case, it was FreeBSD's Jails and ZFS support that won Corci over, and it's easy to see why. While there are countless alternatives to Jails in the Linux world, ZFS is harder to come by as it can't be part of the kernel due to licensing issues. With how powerful and capable ZFS is, it makes sense to want to use it on your server, and in that case, FreeBSD is probably a better choice than most Linux distributions. There are countless reasons to choose one of the BSDs over a Linux distribution, and I'm glad we're seeing an uptick.

22 May 2026 7:00pm GMT

Secure boot and Microsoft CA rollover: a heads-up for distributions

We've already talked about the secure boot certificates from Microsoft that are about to become invalid, but Debian EFI team member and longtime Debian contributor Steve McIntyre published a blog post with more information for users and distribution developers alike. Why are Microsoft's secure boot certificates relevant for the Linux world? Well, Linux distributions use shim to provide secure boot functionality, and this shim is signed with Microsoft's certificates, because they are included in just about every single computer or motherboard ever shipped. The expiration of these oldest certificates should most likely not be a problem, as existing signed binaries should keep working. This is because the UEFI specification does not look at the expiration dates; it only cares that the signature is valid. Unless you have buggy firmware, your machine will continue to boot Linux just fine. Microsoft is already handing out new certificates, but they started the rollout of these way too late, so that's why it's an actual issue today. New machines and updated older machines will most likely have all of these new CAs installed. New machines are already shipping that only include the new CAs; they will not trust older software and this has already started causing problems for some users. If you already have an old shim signed by Microsoft for your distribution from before October 2025, then it will only be signed using the older CA that expires soon. On newer machines, your users will already not be able to boot your distro with Secure Boot enabled. If you want your users to be able to use Secure Boot in future, you will need to get a new shim build submitted, reviewed and signed using the new CA. However, that signed build will not work on older machines unless they have had the new CAs installed. This is also likely to cause problems for some users. You should encourage your users to update their systems NOW before things break for them. ↫ Steve McIntyre I think the Linux world will be able to handle this just fine, but the fact that Microsoft started this process of replacement so late is a real shame. I'm by no means an expert in this field, but I wonder if there isn't some better solution than relying on Microsoft. I understand their certificates will effectively always be installed on every motherboard, but shouldn't we be able to move that responsibility to a more independent entity?

22 May 2026 5:41pm GMT

21 May 2026

OSnews

Google’s plan for ads in its new “AI” chatbot search engine is to let “AI” generate the ads

After Google killed its search engine a few days ago, one question remained: how exactly does advertising fit into all of this? Google is obviously not going to move to chatbot search without somehow adding ads to your conversation with the pachinko machine, so everybody was wondering how that was going to work, exactly. Well, we have the answer, and it's an obvious one. When researching a topic, consumers want to know exactly how a product suits their unique situation. In fact, 75% of people report making faster, more confident decisions using AI Mode in Search. 1 That's why we're testing two new types of ads, built with Gemini, that offer relevant product details along with helpful guidance. To help people evaluate their choices, both of these new formats will feature an independent AI explainer as part of the ad. Our Gemini model evaluates and synthesizes information about a product or service, and displays that context alongside the advertiser's creative. This coherent, independent response ensures transparency and builds trust. These formats will also continue to be clearly labeled as "Sponsored." ↫ Google's Ads & Commerce Blog Of course they're going to just generate the ads with "AI", too. Google will offer two types of "AI"-generated ads in their new chatbot search tool, the first of which will simply be an "AI"-generated answer to a user's question. If you ask the Google chatbot "how can I clean my bed sheets of unintended nightly slop discharge?", Google will generate an ad based on the features of a slopcleaner washing machine detergent product and show that to you. The second type comes in when a user asks something like "what is the best way to kill a search engine?" Google's chatbot will then show a number of ways to kill a search engine, and one of the items in that list might be an ad generated by Google, alongside the customary unrelated information, wrong information, and made-up nonsense. Google claims both of these types of ads will be labeled as such, but I doubt that small label will be noticed by many, and of course, there's no way to know any of the other answers the chatbot generates aren't paid-for either. Here, too, though, we must ask the question what the end game is. This new chatbot search engine is clearly trying to keep you on Google's website, but in doing so, it'll deprive large numbers of websites of the traffic they need to survive. If they can't survive, they're die. If they're dead, they can't produce the content Google "AI" needs to slobber up to spit back out in Google's chatbot search. Chatbot search is also an agent of its own destruction, because you can't generate improved slop with nothing but slop. Because, and I can't repeat this often enough, nobody has ever used "AI" to produce anything of value.

21 May 2026 10:04pm GMT