11 Nov 2011

feedFirebug Google Group

Re: Firebug 1.9 beta 1

The existing AMD module function definitions are unlikely to be changed
again. At least for the 1.9 release they won't change anymore. Though the
modules can always be extended by new functions in future versions.
Honza, please correct me, if I am wrong.
Sebastian

11 Nov 2011 11:02pm GMT

Re: Firebug 1.9 beta 1

Congratulation on the milestone and thank you for the support so far!
And one extension developer question:
Are the AMD modules finalized now?
Thomas

11 Nov 2011 10:44pm GMT

Re: FireBug 1.9.0-a5 Bug Report and 1.9 beta 1.

It's not necessary to open a new thread. Please keep posting to the old one<[link]>
.
Sebastian

11 Nov 2011 10:14pm GMT

27 Oct 2011

feedFirebug Working Group Google Group

Re: Firebug 1.9 beta

See examples on this page:
[link]

The message manager allows sending JSON based packets between chrome
and content processes. That's how Firebug needs to communicate with
the
current page instead of directly accessing it.

The message manager represents API we need from Gecko. This API is

27 Oct 2011 2:02pm GMT

Re: Firebug 1.9 beta

Yes, as soon as e10s replaced the current APIs. I'm aware of that.

Unfortunately the e10s page <[link]> is not
kept up-to-date. We need some specific API examples to be able to start
working on e10s.

So this means (at least for me) as long as the APIs are not existing and

27 Oct 2011 1:11pm GMT

Re: Firebug 1.9 beta

Sounds good

I'll postpone b1 and release a5 instead.

Please cc me on every new report that is blocking the beta.

Thanks!
Honza

27 Oct 2011 10:53am GMT