geek

27 May 2026

OSnews

The exemptions in age-verification laws for open source operating systems are bad, actually

We've talked about the various age verification laws in the United States, and there's been a development recently that a lot of people seem to think is a good thing: both the age verification laws in California and Colorado have received exemptions for open source operating systems. I fail to see how this is a good thing, and luckily, I don't even have to explain why because Liam Squires-Hand from GamingOnLinux already did it for me. When all these laws get stamped and approved, what happens when you run an operating system (let's say Fedora or Ubuntu) and some web service or application is forced to do age checking and verification (or they face massive fines). Unless Linux distributions / desktop environments do end up implementing something that correctly adheres to these laws, what do you think will happen? Those services / apps could very likely just entirely block Linux in certain regions - or even all regions if it's Linux to prevent any issues for them. ↫ Liam Squires-Hand at GamingOnLinux That's the core of it, right there. These nebulous exemptions are not solutions; they're barely even band-aids. Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android will implement whatever fascist anti-privacy age-verification nonsense governments can come up with, and virtually all services and applications that need to implement support for it will just follow along as well. Do you really think they're going to craft exceptions for the few percent of their users running Linux? The past three decades of computing history has made it very clear that no, they will not. But the exceptions have already achieved their goal: the Linux world is happy and lulled right back into a sense of complacency. What could possibly go wrong?

27 May 2026 11:19pm GMT

Slashdot

Meta To Start Testing AI Subscription Services

Meta will begin testing paid subscriptions for its Meta AI app and website, with a $7.99/month Meta One Plus plan and a more capable $19.99/month Meta One Premium plan offering. The test will start next month in Singapore, Guatemala, and Bolivia as Meta looks for AI revenue beyond advertising while continuing to offer a free tier. CNBC reports: Naomi Gleit, the head of product at Meta, revealed the subscription testing in an Instagram video, announcing that the plans "give people who use Meta AI more to work with, more capacity, bigger, more complex requests, and more room to create for businesses and creators." Meta One Plus will cost $7.99 a month and the Meta One Premium plan will cost $19.99 a month, the company confirmed. The more expensive version offers users additional computing capacity to produce more comprehensive responses and other advanced features. The company will continue to provide a free version of the app and site. "We're offering premium tools that allow you to enhance presence, supercharge content, automate tasks, and protect your brand," Gleit said in the post. "We're also thinking about how to bring this all together in a way that makes sense."

OSnews

Gemini, gophers, and fingers: alternative internets beyond HTTPS

But what I want to write about today are three protocols that have their own ecosystems, their own communities, and their own aesthetics. finger://, gopher://, and gemini://. Two predate the World Wide Web entirely, but one was created in 2019, the same year the first black hole photograph circled the planet. None of them require a GUI. None of them require JavaScript. All three of them run in a terminal. ↫ Brennan Day I ran an OSNews Gemini capsule from my office for quite a while, but managing it from my own workstation computer became a little annoying and cumbersome. I should take a weekend off at some point and devise an easy way to convert our RSS feed into separate files for Gopher and Gemini and serve them from my Proxmox mini PC, if only to do my part in contributing to the success of independent protocols.

27 May 2026 10:58pm GMT

Slashdot

Nvidia To Spend $150 Billion a Year In Taiwan

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says the company plans to spend around $150 billion a year in Taiwan, calling it the "epicenter of the AI revolution." "Four years ago, five years ago, Nvidia was spending about $10, $15 billion dollars a year in Taiwan. Now we're spending $100, going to $150 billion dollars in Taiwan each year," Huang said. Reuters reports: Huang was speaking at a launch celebration in Taipei for the chip company's planned Taiwan headquarters, which he said will break ground this year and aims to become operational in 2030. He did not provide a timeframe for the number of years the company plans to invest $150 billion. The Taiwan headquarters will bring Nvidia closer to TSMC, the world's largest contract chipmaker which makes many of the advanced semiconductors powering the trend towards AI and is a major supplier to the U.S. tech company. "Taiwan is booming," Huang said on stage at the celebration which was attended by his parents, wife, daughter and son in addition to around 1,000 employees. "Taiwan is the epicentre of the AI revolution. This is where the chips come, packaging comes, this is where the systems are made, this is where AI supercomputers were created. The number of partners we work with here in Taiwan, incredible."

Ars Technica

California defeats Tesla's attempt to throw out racial discrimination lawsuit

California civil rights agency hails win over Tesla, anticipates trial in July.

27 May 2026 9:08pm GMT

Slashdot

Rust Will Save Linux From AI, Says Greg Kroah-Hartman

Linux stable kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman says Rust can help Linux deal with a flood of AI-discovered security bugs (namely Dirty Frag, Copy Fail, and Fragnesia) by preventing common C mistakes around memory, locking, error handling, and untrusted data at build time rather than during human review. It's "not a silver bullet" and does not mean rewriting the whole kernel, but he said new drivers and subsystems will increasingly use Rust as Linux evolves forward. ZDNet reports: Kroah-Hartman illustrated those pitfalls with real C bugs in the kernel, including a 15-year-old Bluetooth bug that dereferenced a pointer without checking it and a Xen bug where "we forgot to unlock" in an error path. "The majority of the bugs in the kernel are this tiny, minor stuff," he explained. "Error conditions aren't checked, locks aren't forgotten, unreleased memories leak, and vulnerabilities add up over time. They crash the kernel. This is what we live with in C. This is why we don't like it." Kroah-Hartman argued that the "best beauty of Rust" is catching those mistakes at build time rather than in review. For example, when it comes to locking, he highlighted Rust's locking abstractions in the kernel: "The only way you can get access to inner pointers of structures is by grabbing that lock, and releasing the lock automatically. The compiler does it, it's guarded, the lock happens, everything's happy. You just can't write code to access these values...without grabbing the lock. The compiler will not let you." Those properties, he argued, directly remove a huge fraction of the bugs he sees: "This is going to save us those two things. First, 60% of the bugs in the kernel right there, they're gone. Thank you." The payoff is earlier, more automated enforcement: "If this happens at build time, not review time, don't make me a maintainer who has to read your code [and] say, 'Oh, then you properly check that error value. Oh, did you properly grab the locks in the right spot?' Rust gives us that for free. This is the best thing ever." Even if Rust vanished tomorrow, Kroah-Hartman argued, it has already forced the kernel to clean up C code and interfaces. He credited Rust's influence outright: "We stole this from Rust. Thank you. It's a good idea, so if Rust disappeared tomorrow, we have cleaned up the C code in the kernel so much and taken in the ideas. We thank you, you've made Linux better with it just by existing." [...] What ultimately sold a number of core maintainers, including him, on Rust was how it "makes reviewing code easier." With CI [Continuous Integration] bots enforcing builds and Rust's type system enforcing key invariants, maintainers can "focus on the logic" rather than resource bookkeeping: "I can care about that one function. I don't have to worry about the rest of this stuff, because I assume that it works properly, because it was built properly." Internally, he said, the top maintainers have already made their call on Rust's status: "The Linux kernel maintainers, we get together every year and talk about what the processes are doing. Last year, we said the Rust experiment is over. It's not an experiment. This is for real." The rationale: "The people behind it are real. We trust them. We know what they're doing. They've shown and put in the work to make Rust a viable language in the kernel, and we're going to make this stick. Let's go full speed ahead. And, as always," he said wryly, "world domination proceeds." "If you never remember anything else in my talk, just remember these four words. It came from Microsoft Security many, many years ago," Kroah-Hartman told attendees. "They realized all input is evil. You have to validate all input."

Ars Technica

Websites have a new way to spy on visitors: analyzing their SSD activity

Telltale SSD activity can be measured in the browser using simple JavaScript.

27 May 2026 8:56pm GMT

Mystery GPS jammer in Iran becomes test for NASA satellites’ capabilities

NASA science satellites show dual use in locating sources of GPS interference.

27 May 2026 8:43pm GMT

OSnews

Microsoft tries to obscure “AI” features behind flowery design language

Now that my one-month sentence of using Windows 11 has begun (you can follow along!), I'm also a bit more perceptive of news and developments regardingMicrosoft's latest and greatest operating system version. Despite claims to the contrary, we already know the company isn't really removing "AI" features from Windows, merely renaming them instead, but it turns out they're planning something more all encompassing: the Copilot Design System. Long-time Microsoft veteran Jon Friedman published a blog post introducing this new concept. As Copilot steadily evolves into a thought partner-an intelligent presence woven into your workflow-its backbone will become the Copilot Design System, an AI-forward design system we're crafting to feel intentional and humane. From orchestration patterns to iconography, the experience we're building will ultimately have components that work together to amplify thinking, guide decisions, and unlock creativity-seamlessly, wherever you work. Anchored in customer feedback around creating better experiences, a fundamental question guides our system's evolution: how would a thoughtful partner look and behave? ↫ Jon Friedman at Microsoft's design blog I've read the whole post and I still have no idea what most of it is supposed to mean in practice. It feels like the written equivalent of someone trying to put lipstick on a pig, and pretty much anyone is going to see right through the fancy words and phrases and realise what we're really dealing with here: a company trying to figure out just how far they can shove "AI" down your throat before you gag reflex kicks in. You can hide behind flowery language all you want, but if you're selling shit, it's going to stink regardless. The only concrete user interface idea that's come out of this Copilot Design System was a floating Copilot button that permanently floated on top of your workspace area in Word, Excel, and so on, obscuring the actual things you were working on. Users hated it so much that Microsoft had to quickly release what is essentially a hotfix to give people the ability to remove that floating button, putting it in a toolbar instead. Like I said: people see right through these thinly-veiled attempts at baiting them into using your pachinko machine. Anyway, yes, I'm working from Windows 11 now, just as you people paid me to do. Here's the proof: Only 30 days left to go. I can do this.

27 May 2026 6:45pm GMT