fidzu : Operating Systems

Today, you can get low-quality knockoffs of just about any popular smartphone on sites like AliExpress or Temu, whether they be iPhones, Galaxy phones, or whatever else. They have terrible build quality, bottom-of-the-barrel components and specifications, and all run outdated versions of Android - badly. At the same time, various consumer electronics brands, once popular in a bygone era, sell the rights to their brand name to unknown companies, who then put these brands on generic hardware to give their products a sheen of legitimacy. That's why today, you can still buy Nokia smartphones, Polaroid cameras, and low-effort Hi-Fi equipment from various once-respected brands. None of this is new, however. In the late '90s and early 2000s, companies were already doing the same thing. In fact, there's one device from this era which combines both business practices - it's both a cheap knockoff of a wildly successful device, and it carries a once-revered brand name. Also, just to add some juice, this story involves stolen source code. Let's take a look at the worst PDA of all time, the Olivetti daVinci. In 1997, Palm launched the Palm Pilot, and it and its successors proved to be a massive hit. Where countless before it had failed, Palm found the magic formula to make pocket computing work. I wrote an in-depth article about Palm over 13 years ago which goes into much (much) more detail, but the reason the Palm Pilot succeeded where things like the Newton, PenPoint OS, and Windows for Pen Computing failed, is that Palm's founder, Jeff Hawkins, realised that they were competing with paper, not with desktop computers. Instead of trying to shove the capabilities of a full personal computer into a (barely) pockatable device, a pocket computer had to be as fast and convenient as paper, and therefore extremely strict about which features to add, and which to omit. To this day, the entirety of smartphone computing stands on the shoulders of Palm. Palm's ideas, implementations, approaches, paradigms, and even people were absorbed by Apple and Google, where they shaped both iOS and Android. The phone you're looking at right now has a ton of Palm DNA in it, still. After all, you're still using the homescreen-with-apps paradigm Palm already perfected in the late '90s and early 2000s. The success of the Palm Pilot and its successors did not go unnoticed. Microsoft, most prominently, felt incredibly threatened by Palm's success: The success of Palm's products got the attention of Microsoft, and the company pretty much announced it was going to crush Palm. According to Hawkins, Microsoft had a sales conference, where, at some point, a big target appeared on the projector screen, with the Palm logo dead in the centre of it: "we are going to crush and kill these guys", was the central message. Hawkins recalls that he got condolence letters after that, stating things like "Sorry Jeff. Too bad." ↫ Thom Holwerda While Microsoft proved to be unable to "kill and crush" Palm, it did manage to build a relatively successful business selling PDAs running various incarnations of Windows CE. Together, Palm and Microsoft dominated the PDA market pretty much throughout its entire existence, and while the market was a mere fraction of the smartphone market of today, other companies still wanted a piece of this pie too. One of these companies was Olivetti, a storied Italian company with a long history making typewriters, computers, and other electronics. I'm not going into detail about Olivetti's history, but the company was renowned for its attention to design, creating iconic products like the Lexikon 80, Lettera 22, Elea 9003, Programma 101, and so, so many more. Olivetti also entered the personal computer market, first with a variety of custom machines featuring Z80 and later Motorola 68000 processors running a variety of custom operating systems developed by Olivetti (including its own UNIX variant, X/OS). After a few machines using MIPS and Alpha processors in the early '90s, the company would eventually focus entirely on Intel-based PCs (including this amazing failure) running Windows. Like so many other computer makers from that era, Olivetti eventually left the PC business by selling it off in 1997. To this day, Olivetti PCs tend to cost more on the used market than those from other brands, despite no technical merits dictating so. At around this time, our current story begins. Seeing the success of the Palm Pilot and the emergence of copycat devices running Microsoft's Windows CE, Olivetti wanted in on the action. And so, in the late '90s, the company introduced the Olivetti daVinci, a line of PDAs whose software looked suspiciously like Palm OS. There's not a ton of information out there about the development history, but it seems that while Olivetti designed the hardware, it contracted the development of the operating system out to a company from Hong Kong, Echolink Design. And this is where things went horribly wrong for Olivetti. The software Echolink Design developed for the daVinci didn't just look like Palm OS, it was Palm OS - at least, according to Palm. After being on the market for about a year, the Palm Pilot maker, then a subsidiary of 3Com, filed for an injunction, alleging that the daVinci operating system designed by Echolink Design contained actual Palm OS source code. In addition, Palm also filed suit against CompanionLink Software, the company that developed the Outlook synchronisation software for the daVinci. Palm won handily, and within a day of the filing, temporary restraining orders were put in place on both Olivetti and CompanionLink, stopping sales of the daVinci and its software dead in its tracks. It seemed to have been a pretty clear-cut case. From The Wall Street Journal at the time: U.S. District Judge James Ware ruled Olivetti's Royal daVinci organizer contains software that appears to have been copied from the operating system for 3Com's Palm organizers. Judge Ware said a review by a software expert found the daVinci software contains private Palm code and even grammatical

14 Aug 2026 7:18pm GMT

In the last few days, I built a shoot 'em up game by embedding a tiny custom bytecode VM and rendering the graphics using a fullscreen pixel shader. The result is a 3kB Windows executable. This was done for Langjam Gamejam, a 7-day challenge where you create a programming language and then use it to build a game. The project combines several interests of mine: language tooling, game development, procedural graphics, and demoscene-style size constraints. The game jam format forced me to keep the scope small and explore new ideas. Also, it was fun! ↫ Laurent Le Brun In seven days, Le Brun created a brand new programming language, compiler, bytecode interpreter, a game written in the new language, and rendered it, ending up with a 3kB self-contained executable. It's amazing what humans can do.

14 Aug 2026 6:57pm GMT

A while back, when chatting with a colleague over their computer, I noticed that a logo did not look exactly the same as it did on mine. It looked thinner on theirs and more faithful to the original image. It was rendered at 15px; here is an upscaled version. If you squint, or take a step back, the one from Chrome looks thicker. A bit weird, but swapping the image for an SVG fixed it. Still, I was curious: why was it rendering like this in the first place? I did some digging and found a nifty optimization that Chrome uses when rendering JPEGs at small scales. ↫ Guillaume Técher I love it when people detail their discoveries like this.

14 Aug 2026 6:50pm GMT

Another month started almost two weeks ago, so we've got a new monthly report from Redox, the general purpose operating system written in Rust. The month of July - it seems the report was published with a bit of a delay, regardless of what the date on their site says - brought improvements to the installer, with new options commonly found in most installers, such as a choice of installation method, network-based installation, and more. The Google Summer of Code work on the new CPU scheduler has also been merged, including a number of related performance enhancements. There's improvements to the ARM port, Amlogic Meson UART ARM64 support, and uutils grep and sed have been successfully built on Redox, replacing their their GNU counterparts in the os-test test suite. In addition, a whole slew of demos were ported as well, from Ratatui demos to various Iced demos covering things like reading QR codes and processing Markdown. Of course, this is all topped off with the usual long list of lower-level, smaller changes and improvements to the kernel, drivers, Relibc, and more.

12 Aug 2026 11:15pm GMT

The OSNews Fundraiser, to celebrate the fact I posted 20000 stories in 21 years, is still underway. The first major incentive was reached, and I, a long-time Linux user, published my experiences using Windows 11 for a month. It wasn't a success. Keep donating if you want to find out what a Linux user thinks of the current state of macOS! Why support OSNews? I want to make sure I can run OSNews for another two decades and another 20000 posts, and I need your help to do so. Since my wife, who has a tough, underpaid job in elderly care, is largely unable to work due to health reasons caused by that very same job, my income has become a lot more crucial for our kids, my wife, and myself. With OSNews readers being more skeptical of subscription-like things like our Patreon than most people, it's exactly these one-time donations that make up the bulk of your support. Thank you.

12 Aug 2026 6:40pm GMT

Raymond Chen explains what, exactly, the file winstart.bat in Windows 95 is used for. In Windows 95, you could create a winstart.bat file in your Windows directory. During startup, the virtual machine manager initializes and creates the so-called "System virtual machine" (the "System VM"), which is the virtual machine that all Windows programs run in. But before running the user-mode kernel in that virtual machine, the virtual machine manager runs the winstart.bat batch file if it exists. ↫ Raymond Chen Chen needs to use several diagrams to really explain what the batch file is used for, but as a very crude summary, it allows you to load TSRs that only apply to Windows programs, while not affecting any additional DOS command prompts you may load later after Windows is already running. While many think it's a Windows 95 feature, it was already present in Windows 3.x. A unique feature that I doubt many people made active use of.

12 Aug 2026 6:24pm GMT

Delphi is still very much a thing, and still very much in active development. The current stewards of Delphi, Embarcadero, released the Delphi 13 Community Edition today. Delphi Community Edition is a full-featured, free edition of Delphi for building native applications with the Delphi language. It includes a professional IDE, visual designers, integrated compilers and debuggers, the VCL framework for Windows development, and the FireMonkey framework for creating native applications from a shared codebase across Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android. It is designed for students, hobbyists, freelancers, and small teams that meet the Community Edition license requirements. ↫ Marco Cantu at the Embarcadero blog Delphi has been around since 1995, first released for Windows 3.1. It's both a programming language, a variant of Object Pascal, and the accompanying IDE and related tooling and frameworks, originally developed by legendary company Borland. This latest version of course adds a number of new features to the programming language, and further improves the IDE as well, this time with a brand new 64bit version. The two frameworks for visual application development, VCL and FireMonkey, have also been updated and improved. Sadly, it's not open source, and the Community Edition is intended for mostly non-commercial, hobbyist use. If you want to actually earn any money using Delphi, you're going to have to step up to Delphi 13 Florence, which isn't free.

12 Aug 2026 6:14pm GMT

The slow but steady march to the grave for the Android Open Source Project continues. Every few months Google hammers another big nail in the coffin of Android as an open source effort, and I've documented them all here on OSNews (nail, nail, nail, nail, nail), coming to the conclusion long ago that for all intents and purposes, Android is no longer an open source operating system. The latest move, however, is just petty. According to GrapheneOS on , Google has apparently replaced public, instant code downloads for Pixel phone drivers with a manual request form. Instead of publishing code directly to open developer platforms where anyone can grab it, Google now requires developers to fill out a Google Form and wait for someone to send them a Google Drive link. What used to take a couple of hours is now taking weeks. ↫ Hillary Keverenge at Android Authority I'm perhaps misremembering, but I vaguely recall discussions decades ago about what, exactly, it meant to "make source code available", as open source licenses state in a variety of words. Would mailing a paper print-out by classic post satisfy such requirements? Could you write the source code on a brick and throw it through the user's window? Could you hire a church choir to sing it? These are all silly examples, but before everyone had internet access, this was a relevant question. The widespread availability of the internet and software like git solved these issues, which makes it all the more petty that Google now requires an actual application process, waiting times, and Google Drive dumps just to get access to the source code for Pixel drivers. Google is clearly trying to kill whatever's left of the Android Open Source Project's rotting corpse, only barely technically complying with any license requirements only because they're obligated to. The Android team at Google must be a hoot at parties.

11 Aug 2026 10:45pm GMT

The GNOME Shell user interface has mostly seen minor refinements and quality of life updates in recent cycles, but on the design side we've explored a lot of longer-term things we'd like to do. Some of these we have relatively complete plans for, others are more vague ideas that need more research and prototyping. As always, getting things like these implemented depends on developer capacity and interest (and sometimes funding). While each of these ideas may require additional discussion, prototyping, and testing, we (the design team) have collected them all together here to share our longer-term vision and to give each idea more visibility. ↫ Tobias Bernard on the GNOME blog There's quite a few good ideas in there, with most of them already being available in the form of various extensions. I'm not entirely sure if I'm a huge fan of copying Android and iOS by moving notifications into the quick settings dropdown thing, but it's not like having them in the clock/calendar dropdown thing is any better. I only use notifications as they arrive and never look at the place where they end up - that's a mobile thing for me - so I don't think I'll really care either way. Things like editable quick settings, transparent top bar on certain backgrounds, the improved window drag and drop in the Exposé view, the alt+tab experiments, and some of the others do seem quite interesting though, and anything that reduces the number of GNOME extensions I need to install and keep updated gets a big thumbs up from me. If you wish to work on any of these suggestions, working on GNOME Shell has gotten a lot easier recently. In the past, GNOME Shell was significantly harder to contribute to and test than apps since you needed to use tools like jhbuild. This has changed in the past year: You can now easily build and test your branch in a nested session from Builder using Mutter Devkit. If you use GNOME OS, you can even build a sysext to install your branch on your host system. This allows daily driving experimental branches easily, which is super helpful for evaluating changes to everyday workflows. ↫ Tobias Bernard on the GNOME blog That's quite neat.

11 Aug 2026 10:18pm GMT

This was bound to happen. According to a new report from Taiwanese publication United Daily News (UDC,) Microsoft is raising the cost of Windows license fees for hardware makers by a much higher amount than normal. According to the report, certain OEMs are seeing licensing price hikes of between 7% and 10%. ↫ Zac Bowden at Windows Central Like every other tech company diving head-first into "AI", Microsoft is losing money on its gamble head-over-fist, with no profitability in sight. Since admitting betting the company on "AI" was a mistake is out of the question, Microsoft has to extract the money from somewhere else to make up for it. The cost of Windows licenses for OEMs is an obvious lever to pull, as OEMs really have nowhere else to turn to (yes, desktop Linux is making gains, but not in any meaningful numbers), so they'll take hit and pass the cost on to consumers. The end result will be that prices for laptops will increase even more than they already have thanks to the "AI"-induced RAM and component crisis, creating a double-whammy of price increases caused by "AI", either directly or indirectly. It's just another category of products we can add to the cost of living crisis that's causing untold harm and damage to hardworking people all over the world. The price of incompetence is rarely paid for by the incompetent.

11 Aug 2026 12:34pm GMT

I found some ambiguous wording in the c89(/c90) standard, where GCC and Clang disagree on the interpretation. It concerns the behavior of implicit function declarations, which were removed in c99, so this was never disambiguated. ↫ Sebastian at sebsite I am not going pretend to understand any of this.

11 Aug 2026 12:17pm GMT

Enlightenment desktop is a low on resources desktop environment without sacrificing on visuals. NetBSD support for this BSD-licensed desktop has been left a few years behind. The aim of this project is to port the newest version of the desktop to pkgsrc and commit upstream portability fixes when necessary to ease future versions updates for NetBSD. ↫ Dimitris Gounaridis on the NetBSD blog Enlightenment seems like a natural fit for NetBSD, so I'm glad they dedicated a GSoC project to getting the existing, outdated port up to snuff. The project is not complete as there's a few issues to work out before it can be packaged for easy installation, but this is great progress already.

11 Aug 2026 11:52am GMT

Akihabara, Tokyo's famous "Electric Town," is overflowing with foreign tourists these days, drawn by anime shops, maid cafes, and duty-free electronics megastores. But there is one storefront most of them walk past without a glance: Akizuki Denshi Tsusho. It may be one of those pockets of Japan that foreign visitors never see. Step inside and the narrow aisles are packed - not with tourists, but with Japanese customers hunting for electronic parts. It is a scene that has repeated itself here for more than 50 years. For readers outside Japan, imagine something between Adafruit, SparkFun, and a discount surplus warehouse. If you start tinkering with electronics in Japan, Akizuki's website is the one you will open before any other. Generations of Japanese engineers, students, and hobbyists have treated it as the default source for parts, the way you might default to Digi-Key or Mouser. ↫ Gakuto Ochi and an uncredited translator I've long been fascinated by places like Akizuki Denshi Tsusho and other places like it in South Korea and China's Shenzhen. An unending labyrinth of unimaginable amounts of technology stacked floor to ceiling. Whether they be like Akizuki, which focuses on the tiniest of electrical components, or more like the malls in Shenzhen, which seem to focus more on assembled parts, the idea of browsing through them in wonder draws me in like a moth to a flame. I'm sad these places don't exist anymore (or in most cases, never did) closer to home, but perhaps someday I'll have enough time and funds to visit Tokyo or Shenzen and let myself be overwhelmed by things I don't understand, and people speaking languages entirely alien to me.

11 Aug 2026 11:45am GMT

Cookies are ancient technology, and in no way necessary of even particularly desirable to track you. Modern fingerprinting doesn't need them at all. A live demonstration of everything a website learns about you before you click anything with no cookies. It reads you during the connection and in the first two seconds of JavaScript, then narrates what it found back to you in plain English, as if a stranger were describing you out loud. The argument isn't "look how creepy this site is." It's: the site you visit after this one can do all of it too, and won't tell you. ↫ Kuber Mehta Also note, as the demonstration does, that if some of the things it determines about you are wrong, that doesn't really matter. In fact, it may actually make fingerprinting and tracking you easier; as long as fingerprinting consistently gets the same things wrong in the same way, it becomes a valuable part of the fingerprint, like a small scar obscuring part of your real thumb's fingerprint. Online tracking of people should be illegal.

10 Aug 2026 9:11pm GMT

Back in 2014, Microsoft released the source code to the first Windows version of Word, version 1.1a. Now, Justin Marshall has ported this code to modern versions of Windows, so you can run it as if it were any other modern application. This project is a fully working native Windows x64 port of Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a, whose historical codename was Opus. It builds the original Word source and resources together with modern replacements for the 16-bit assembly, segmented-memory, and Win16 platform boundaries. The result is the original Word application and user experience running as a 64-bit Windows executable. This is not an emulator or a reimplementation using a modern editor control. ↫ Justin Marshall Neat endeavour.

10 Aug 2026 1:18pm GMT

Top supplier of great articles Nicole Branagan is at it again. We're back into the strip mahjong games today, here going back to 1991. Video System is a company that's probably best known in retro-gaming circles for Aero Fighters/Sonic Wings, but mahjong games (usually branded Idol Mahjong) were one of their bigger moneymakers. And there's something interesting going on here- Idol Mahjong Final Romance 2-R-4 Special re-releases the final three games in the series, which all also got contemporary console releases, but the first game in the series has never been seen outside of its original arcade launch. Why? ↫ Nicole Branagan Look, you're not going to get something like this from anyone else.

10 Aug 2026 1:09pm GMT